Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Translate the following sentence to Romanian: Control will be implemented by the country's Food Safety Directorate.

answer:Controlul va fi implementat de către Direcția de Siguranță Alimentară a țării.

question:Suggest a movie title for the following movie plot: Ex-con and expert safe-cracker Gary "Gal" Dove (Ray Winstone) has served his time behind bars and happily retired to a Spanish villa with his beloved ex–porn star wife DeeDee (Amanda Redman). He also has the company of long-time best friend Aitch (Cavan Kendall) and his wife Jackie (Julianne White). Their serene life is shattered by the arrival of an old criminal associate, the sociopathic Don Logan (Ben Kingsley), who is intent on enlisting Gal in a bank heist back in London. Organising the heist is Teddy Bass (Ian McShane), a powerful crime lord, who has learned about the bank's vault from Harry (James Fox), the bank's chairman whom he met at an orgy. Gal politely but firmly declines Logan's many demands to join the heist, but Logan will not back down. After revealing an obsessive infatuation with Jackie, Logan also makes several unwelcome attempts at reconnecting with her. Logan eventually grows furious, hurling torrents of verbal abuse at the group while at the same time spitefully painting himself as a victim of their betrayal. After storming away in a rage, Logan boards a plane back to London, only to be kicked off for refusing to put out his cigarette. Seething with hatred, Logan returns to Gal's home with menacing intentions, hitting a glass beer bottle into Gal's ear. DeeDee shoots Logan with a shotgun, incapacitating him. The four friends join in their efforts to kill him, first beating him, stamping on him, shooting him again, and finally crushing his skull. Hoping to cover up Logan's murder, Gal returns to London to perform the job. When asked by Bass about Logan's whereabouts, Gal feigns ignorance and claims Logan had called him "from Heathrow". However, Bass is visibly suspicious, and Gal's anxieties mount. During the heist, Bass' crew use surface-supplied diving gear to drill into Harry's bank vault from a pool in a neighbouring bath house. The water from the pool floods the vault and shorts its security system. While helping to empty the vault's safe deposit boxes, Gal secretly pockets a...

answer:"Cracking Paradise: A Dangerous Reunion"

question:You are an AI assistant, who knows every language and how to translate one language to another. Given a task, you explain in simple steps what the task is asking, any guidelines that it provides. You solve the task and show how you used the guidelines to solve the task. You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task. In this task, you're given the title and three arbitrary sentences out of a five-sentence story. You are also given three additional sentence options, a, b, and c, that may or may not belong to the story. Your job is to pick the two options that seamlessly connect with the rest of the story; note that the selected choices may fit into the story at any point. Indicate your selected choices in order, i.e., as 'ab'/'bc'/'ac' and not as 'ba'/'ca'/'cb'. If options are equally plausible, pick the ones that make more sense. Title: One day a man in a grinch costume came into a yoga class. And made squawking sounds with every pose. Eventually the class was over and his fur was matted. Choices: a. He was covered in green fur and body paint. b. He dared Hilary to try to destroy it again. c. When he left no one knew who he was. Output:

answer:Task explanation: 1. Analyze the given title and three sentences of the story. 2. Choose two out of the three additional sentence options (a, b, and c) that fit best in the story. 3. Indicate the chosen options in order (ab, bc, or ac). Title: One day a man in a grinch costume came into a yoga class. 1. And made squawking sounds with every pose. 2. Eventually the class was over and his fur was matted. 3. (Choice to be made) 4. (Choice to be made) 5. When he left no one knew who he was. Choices: a. He was covered in green fur and body paint. b. He dared Hilary to try to destroy it again. c. When he left no one knew who he was. Finding the most suitable options: Option b does not fit the story, as there is no context regarding destruction or a character named Hilary within the story. So, options a and c fit the story better. Selected choices: ac Final order: Title: One day a man in a grinch costume came into a yoga class. 1. And made squawking sounds with every pose. 2. He was covered in green fur and body paint. 3. Eventually the class was over and his fur was matted. 5. When he left no one knew who he was.

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Here is a premise: We both looked ridiculous. Here is a hypothesis: It was only I who looked ridiculous. Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?

answer:In order to analyze whether the hypothesis can be concluded from the premise, let's first break down the statement and identify the key elements. Premise: "We both looked ridiculous." In this statement, "we both" refers to two people (the speaker and another person), and "looked ridiculous" describes their appearance. Altogether, the statement claims that they had absurd or foolish appearances. Hypothesis: "It was only I who looked ridiculous." Here, "only I" refers to the speaker exclusively, and "looked ridiculous" still refers to an absurd or foolish appearance. The hypothesis proposes that only the speaker looked ridiculous, whereas the other person did not have that appearance. Now, let's evaluate if the hypothesis can be concluded based on the premise. According to the premise, both individuals seemed ridiculous. This establishes that at least one of them, the speaker, looked ridiculous. However, it does not imply that the other person did not look ridiculous. Here is a counter-example to test this hypothesis: Consider a scenario where two friends, Alice and Bob, are attending a costume party. Alice is wearing an outfit that has bright colors and oversized shoes, making her look ridiculous. Bob is wearing an outfit featuring a unicorn onesie, which also makes him appear ridiculous. In this case, the premise is true because they both (Alice and Bob) look ridiculous. However, the hypothesis claims that only Alice (assuming Alice is the speaker) looked ridiculous. This would mean that Bob did not look ridiculous, which contradicts the original premise. In this scenario, the hypothesis cannot follow from the premise. In conclusion, based on the given information, it is not possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then the hypothesis is also true. The premise establishes that both individuals looked ridiculous, but the hypothesis suggests that only the speaker looked ridiculous and the other person did not. This claim cannot be substantiated by the premise alone, as the hypothesis does not follow logically from the premise.

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded