Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. QUESTION: Test for natural language inference. Premise: "Here is a picture of a construction crew getting ready to go to work on a skyscraper." Hypothesis: "The picture was taken recently." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Let's solve it slowly: We don't know it was taken recently or a longer time. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Given the sentence "A large brown dog is running across sand dunes in front of some small green foliage." can we conclude that "A large brown dog is sitting in front of some small green foliage."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's solve it slowly: The large brown dog is not necessarily sitting in front of the foliage. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Can we conclude from "The rugby player got the ball but he is smashing his head into the ground." that "The rugby player passed out."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Let's solve it slowly:

answer:The sentence only states that the rugby player is smashing his head into the ground, but it doesn't provide information about him passing out. The answer is it is not possible to tell.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Q: Given the sentence "A black dog with white paws stands on a large rock in a field." is it true that "A dog is looking for a duck."? A: Standing on a large rock does not necessarily mean looking for a duck. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A large amount of people using sleeping bags to sleep in front of a building." that "A large amount of people sleeping for a protest."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Let's solve it slowly: Sleeping in front of a building does not imply it being for a protest. The answer is it is not possible to tell. [QUESTION] Premise: "Two teams playing against each other." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "One red and one blue with two members squaring off." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no The teams played in colors red and blue had two people play each other. The answer is yes. Q: Premise: "A man in a tuxedo standing in front of a large group of formally dressed youths." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A director prepares a new song for his orchestra to perform." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no A: Man does not imply director and standing does not imply prepares a new song. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Premise: "A policeman is riding his motorcycle down the street." Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The cop on a motorcycle is looking for a suspect." is true? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's solve it slowly: Not all policeman riding his motorcycle down the street is looking for a suspect. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Given the sentence "People and shrubs are silhouetted against an indigo sky." can we conclude that "It is so dark you can no longer see the people or the shrubs."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Let's solve it slowly:

answer:Silhouetted implies that the people and shrubs are visible as dark shapes against the indigo sky. The answer is no.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Reasoning and answer: First find the area of the painting: 2 feet * 4 feet = 8 square feet. Then find the area of the wall: 5 feet * 10 feet = 50 square feet. Then divide the area of the painting by the area of the wall and multiply by 100% to express the answer as a percentage: 8 square feet / 50 square feet * 100% = 16%. The answer: 16 What was the question? Question: Hannah hangs a 2 foot by 4 foot painting on a 5 foot by 10 foot wall. What percentage of the wall is taken up by the painting? Since Marlon spent half of the gift card, then half of it which is 200 / 2 = 100 remained on Monday. Then on Tuesday, he spent 100 / 4 = 25. Therefore, he has 100 - 25 = 75 left in his gift card. The answer: 75 Reverse engineering the question: Marlon has a gift card for 200. He spent half of it on Monday and one-fourth of the remainder on Tuesday. How much was left on his gift card? Reasoning and answer: Bruce has 20 more legos than Kent who has 40 so Bruce has 20 + 40 = 60 legos. Simon has 20% more legos than Bruce who has 60 legos so that's .20 * 60 = 12 more legos. 20% more is 12 legos and Bruce has 60 so Simon has 12 + 60 = 72 legos. The answer: 72 What was the question? Question: Simon has 20% more legos than Bruce, who has 20 more than Kent. If Kent has 40 legos, how many does Simon have? Jake delivers 234 x 4 = 936 newspapers in a month. Miranda delivers 234 x 2 = 468 newspapers in a week. So she delivers 468 x 4 = 1872 newspapers in a month. Hence, Miranda delivers 1872 - 936 = 936 newspapers more than Jake in a month. The answer: 936 Reverse engineering the question: Jake delivers 234 newspapers a week. Miranda delivers twice as many newspapers a week. How many more newspapers does Miranda deliver than Jake in a month? Reasoning and answer: Her goal is 1 hour a day for 5 days so on a weekly basis, she exercises 1 * 5 = 5 hours. If she works 5 hours a week for 8 weeks then she exercises 5 * 8 = 40 hours in 8 weeks. The answer: 40 What was the question? Question: Jane's goal is to exercise 1 hour a day, 5 days a week. If she hits her goal weekly for 8 weeks, how many hours has Jane exercised? Reasoning and answer: Half the people at the party is 16 / 2 = 8 people. 8 people at the party eat 1 1 / 2 rolls each, 8 x 1 1 / 2 = 12 dinner rolls eaten. 8 people at the party eat 1 / 2 a roll each, 8 x 1 / 2 = 4 dinner rolls eaten. Combined, the people at the party ate 12 + 4 = 16 dinner rolls. There were originally 40 dinner rolls - 16 that got eaten = 24 dinner rolls leftover. The answer: 24 What was the question? Question:

answer:At a party of 16 people, half of them eat 1 1/2 dinner rolls each and the other half eat 1/2 a dinner roll each. If there were originally 40 dinner rolls, how many dinner rolls are left over?

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Mark collects money for the homeless. He visits 20 households a day for 5 days and half of those households give him a pair of 20s. How much did he collect? Give me reasons, before answering the question

answer:To find out how much Mark collected, we can break down the problem step-by-step: 1. Mark visits 20 households a day for 5 days, so the total number of households he visits is: 20 households/day * 5 days = 100 households 2. Half of those households give him a pair of 20s, so the number of households that contribute is: 100 households * 0.5 = 50 households 3. Each contributing household gives him a pair of 20s, which means they give him: 20 + 20 = 40 dollars 4. Now, we can calculate the total amount Mark collected by multiplying the number of contributing households by the amount given by each household: 50 households * 40 dollars/household = 2000 dollars So, Mark collected 2000 dollars for the homeless. The reasons behind this calculation are that we first determined the total number of households he visited, then found how many of them contributed, and finally multiplied that number by the amount each contributing household gave him.

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded