Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Here is a news article: Ashton Kutcher is one of the most popular users on Twitter, now with 6.3 million followers. Only five accounts have more followers, but Kutcher's account was hacked today at TED, RWW reported this evening. The hack appears to have taken place over a local network at TED by someone nearby Kutcher. RWW noted it was "particularly humorous," but also embarrassing for Twitter, and speculated it could hurt the social network: How excited will the stars Twitter seeks to get onboard be when they find out how easy it is for strangers to hijack their identities? Probably not very excited! The two tweets following the hack were, "Ashton, you've been Punk'd. This account is not secure. Dude, where's my SSL?" and "P.S. This is for those young protesters around the world who deserve not to have their Facebook & Twitter accounts hacked like this. #SSL" The tweets were posted to his account @aplusk on Wednesday evening and were still on his page as of 8:50 p.m. Eastern Time (screenshot below). LOOK: ||||| Tweet with a location You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more ||||| TV star Ashton Kutcher may have more followers than all but 5 other people on Twitter (6,393,559) but he apparently has at least one snarky and politically minded adversary at the prestigious TED conference this week. Kutcher's account on Twitter appears to have been compromised this afternoon, having posted two messages purportedly from someone else nearby. How excited will the stars Twitter seeks to get onboard be when they find out how easy it is for strangers to hijack their identities? Probably not very excited! "Ashton, you've been Punk'd," the first of two Tweets read. "This account is not secure. Dude, where's my SSL?" SSL, or Secure Sockets Layer, is a security measure that many people have called on Twitter and Facebook to enable by default. "P.S. This is for those young protesters around the world who deserve not to have their Facebook & Twitter accounts hacked like this. #SSL," read the next message. Update: It's been 4 hours now and it's getting harder to believe that Kutcher hasn't heard about this yet. He hasn't deleted those tweets or tweeted anything else since. It's odd. ||||| A summary of this is?

answer:Ashton Kutcher, a popular user on Twitter with 6.3 million followers, had his account hacked at the TED conference. The hacker posted two tweets on Kutcher's account (@aplusk), highlighting the lack of SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) security on Twitter and showing empathy for young protesters around the world who have experienced similar hacks on their social media accounts. The incident raises concerns about the security of Twitter, especially for high-profile individuals, and the potential reluctance of some stars to join the platform due to doubts about their privacy and the vulnerability of their accounts.

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Given the question: What is great art? On the one hand, we can all see that great art is old art which is called great. But how do we know which art of our own times is great, and which will be forgotten? And who decides? These are important questions, for the great art of the past often was not considered great during its own time. When Shakespeare and Charles Dickens were writing, for example, most critics considered them as hack writers with little or no literary ability. Similarly, Van Gogh and many of the other Impressionist painters of the late nineteenth century were not allowed to participate in events involving what were thought to be the "real" painters of the time, and often they were very poor. Yet today their paintings often sell for millions of dollars, while those so-called "real" painters are now barely remembered. So what makes great art? Can, for example, rock music be great art? Music videos? Cartoons and comics? Those who call themselves critics of the fine arts often have been the last to recognize great art in the past, and we can probably expect this to be the situation today. Critics often don't recognize great art because they tend to be prejudiced against what is popular. Popular works, whether they are novels, movies, or comics, are usually considered to be produced for the sake of money only, and not for the sake of art. But popularity, it seems to me, is one of the three signs that a present-day work of art may come to be thought of as great. The other two are that it is groundbreaking, and that it is inherently beautiful. Many works have one or even two of these qualities of being popular, unusual, and beautiful. But having all the three often will mean that a work of art will someday be seen to be great, though it may take a good spoonful of time, such as a century or two, to know for sure. What can be inferred from the passage? A) Critics have changed their attitudes to great works. B) Most of the opinions of critics are valueless. C) The work of art itself, not the critics, determines its greatness. D) Works of Impressionist painters will be great one day. The answer is:

answer:C) The work of art itself, not the critics, determines its greatness. The passage highlights that great art is often not recognized during its own time, using examples of Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, Van Gogh, and Impressionist painters. It emphasizes that critics have been the last to recognize great art in the past, primarily because they tend to be prejudiced against popular works. However, the text also acknowledges that popularity, being groundbreaking, and inherent beauty are the three signs that a present-day work of art may come to be thought of as great. While it is true that some critics' opinions may be valueless (B), the passage does not explicitly infer that most of their opinions are so. It does imply, though, that critics do not always recognize greatness in art primarily due to their biases. The passage does not discuss the change in critics' attitudes (A) or the future greatness of Impressionist painters specifically (D). Instead, it emphasizes that the work of art itself ultimately determines its greatness, and time often acts as a revealing factor.

question:If I tell you that Exercise can teach animals how to behave, and ask you the question "what can teach animals how to behave?", is the correct answer "adding heat"?

answer:No, the correct answer would be "exercise" based on the information you provided.

question:You should describe the task and explain your answer. While answering a multiple choice question, first output the correct answer(s). Then explain why other answers are wrong. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Select from the following. [1]. negative; [2]. positive; What would be an example of an [2]. review?

answer:The correct answer is [2]. positive. An example of a positive review would be: "I had a great experience at this restaurant! The food was delicious, the staff was friendly, and the atmosphere was cozy. I highly recommend trying the pizza, as it was the best I've ever tasted." The other option, [1]. negative, is incorrect because it refers to a review that focuses on the not-so-good aspects of an experience and might not recommend the place to others.

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded