Appearance
question:You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much as you can. Answer the following question: You are presented with the quiz "What has a layer of fat under the skin to help insulate the body?" But you don't know the answer, so you turn to your teacher to ask for hints. He says that "mammals have a layer of fat under the skin to help insulate the body" and "of the sea mammals, especially the seal and walrus are hunted". So, what's the best answer to the question? OPT: [i] walruses [ii] bears [iii] the Sun [iv] water [v] rabbit [vi] ice [vii] animals [viii] humans Answer:
answer:[i] walruses
question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Does "wave" mean the same thing in these two sentences? She asked the hairdresser to wave her hair. She waved her gun.
answer:No, "wave" does not mean the same thing in these two sentences. In the first sentence, "wave" means to create a wavy or curly style in her hair. It's like making the hair look like gentle ocean waves. In the second sentence, "wave" means to move or swing the gun back and forth quickly. It's like saying hello with your hand but holding a gun instead.
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Here is a premise: Once a company buys that software, it is less likely to switch content providers. Here is a hypothesis: There are no instances where a person would want to switch content providers. Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?
answer:No, it is not possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis. Let's analyze the premise, hypothesis, and reasoning behind this conclusion in more detail. Premise: Once a company buys that software, it is less likely to switch content providers. The premise suggests that the purchase of a particular software reduces the likelihood of a company switching content providers. This could be due to several reasons such as the software being tailored for a specific content provider, the cost of changing content providers, or the time and resources required for re-integrating the software with another content provider. At this point, it's important to note that it indicates a reduced likelihood, not a complete inability or cessation of switching content providers. Hypothesis: There are no instances where a person would want to switch content providers. The hypothesis claims that there are no reasons or situations in which a person would want to switch content providers. This statement is too absolute and does not take into consideration the many factors that could influence a person's decision to switch content providers. These factors could include dissatisfaction with the quality or offerings of the current content provider, better pricing or deals from another provider, the acquisition of the current content provider by another company, or technological advances that make the services of another content provider more attractive. In order to establish the truth of the hypothesis based on the premise, one would need to prove that the premise guarantees that there are no instances where a person would want to switch content providers. However, this is clearly not the case. The premise only suggests that the likelihood of switching is reduced due to factors related to software purchase, not that switching becomes completely impossible or undesirable. Comparison and Conclusion: Since the premise only suggests a reduced likelihood of switching content providers and does not cover all possible reasons or situations why a person would want to switch, it is not possible to conclude that if the premise is true, the hypothesis must be true as well. The hypothesis posits an absolute statement that negates any possibility of a person wanting to switch content providers, while the premise acknowledges that there still might be instances of switching, albeit at a lower frequency or likelihood. Therefore, the truth of the premise does not guarantee the truth of the hypothesis.
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. I am a movie director and I just received the following movie plot. Could you help me answer this question? If not, let me know by writing "Not answerable". Plot title: The Lookout Movie plot: Driving with his headlights off down a country highway, to show his girlfriend, Kelly, and another couple the swarms of fireflies illuminated in the summer night, Chris Pratt crashes his convertible into a combine stalled on the road. Chris and Kelly survive, but the other two do not. Chris's injuries include brain damage that affects his short-term memory in the form similar to anterograde amnesia, along with some anger management issues.Four years later, he's in classes to learn new skills, including the simple sequencing of daily tasks to compensate for his inability to remember, and keeps notes to himself in a small notebook. Challenged by a tough case manager to build a life despite his injuries, he is emotionally supported by his roommate, a blind man named Lewis, but receives only financial support from his wealthy family. He works nights, cleaning a small-town bank, with regular visitations from Ted, a sheriff's deputy. Chris aspires to train as a teller, but the bank manager, Mr. Tuttle, can barely hide his contempt for Chris's ambitions. It is there Chris comes under the scrutiny of a gang planning to rob the bank. Their leader, Gary, who knows him from high school and resented his wealth and popularity as a hockey star before his accident, befriends him and uses a young woman, Luvlee, to seduce him. Taunted by the gang about the limitations of his life since the accident, he initially goes along with the scheme. His frustrations trickle down into confrontations with his friends, Lewis and Ted.When the gang arrives the night of the robbery, Chris tells them he has changed his mind. But they tell him it's too late and force him to empty the vault at gunpoint. His friend Ted, the deputy, stumbles into the robbery while delivering doughnuts to Chris, and triggers a shootout. The deputy and two of the gang members, Marty and Cork, are killed. Meanwhile Chris escapes in the getaway car, and when he realizes he's got the money they stole, he returns compulsively to the site of his accident, where he... My question: What sport did Chris play? Answer:
answer:Chris was a popular hockey star in high school before his accident.