Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Q: Fact 1: Irradiating food can be used to kill existing microorganisms in the food. Fact 2: Microorganisms in food are also responsible for the spoilage of food. Given the two facts above, irradiating food prevents what? OPTIONS: (A). discoloration; (B). bacteria; (C). freezing; (D). Dehydration; (E). spoilage; (F). cancer; (G). bad odors; (H). apoptosis; A:

answer:Given the two facts: Fact 1: Irradiating food can be used to kill existing microorganisms in the food. Fact 2: Microorganisms in food are also responsible for the spoilage of food. Now, let's analyze the options one by one: (A) discoloration: Although irradiation might also affect discoloration to some extent, this is not specifically mentioned in the given facts. (B) bacteria: This option is true but it does not encompass the full scope of microorganisms or spoilage prevention. (C) freezing: Irradiation doesn't prevent freezing and is unrelated to the given facts. (D) Dehydration: It is also not mentioned or implied in the given facts. (E) spoilage: The given facts state that microorganisms are responsible for spoilage, and irradiation can kill those microorganisms, so this should be the correct answer. (F) cancer: This is unrelated to the given facts. (G) bad odors: Some bad odors might be reduced by killing microorganisms, but this is not the main effect implied by the given facts. (H) apoptosis: This option is unrelated to the given facts as well. Based on the analysis, the answer is: (E) spoilage

question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Liang Xiyan still misses her long black hair, which was cut two weeks ago. Liang became a senior high school student in September. In her new school, the rules say that boys' hairstyles must be cropped and girls' hair cannot fall below their shoulders. Liang's school is not alone: many have similar rules on hairstyles. Teachers think a cool hairstyle is a waste of time and money. It may also _ students from their studies. "Your personality is not shown in how you wear your hair but in your ability," say teachers. It's difficult for students to follow these rules. Teenage students like to look nice but they are asked to wear school uniforms. Liang says the only way in which they can be different lies in how they wear their hair. And they want to copy their favorite stars' hairstyles. They wouldn't be happy in a school with strict rules. "I prefer a school with rules on hairstyles," said Li Man, a Senior 1 student. She said her school's rules on hairstyles are OK but there could be some little changes. "For example, boys should be allowed to have their hair a little longer," Li said. "But students must not dye or curl their hair . This way there will not be so many complaints." Now, provide a numbered list of answers to these questions: 1. Who is the story about? 2. Who is Liang? 3. Are they a boy or a girl? 4. Do they like their school? 5. Why not? 6. What kind of rules? 7. What is the rule? 8. What is Liang's hair like? 9. Are they making her cut it? 10. How does she feel about that? 11. Why does the school have that rule? 12. Who says that? 13. Is her institution the only one that has these rules? 14. What does Liang think about it? 15. Can they wear whatever clothes they want? 16. What do they have to wear? 17. Do all the students agree with Liang? 18. Who disagrees? 19. Who is that? 20. What do they think? Numbered answers:

answer:1. The story is about Liang Xiyan. 2. Liang is a senior high school student. 3. They are a girl. 4. It can be inferred that Liang might have conflicted feelings about her school. 5. Liang does not like the rules about hairstyles. 6. The rules are about students' hairstyles. 7. The rule states that boys' hairstyles must be cropped and girls' hair must not fall below their shoulders. 8. Liang's hair used to be long and black. 9. Yes, the school made her cut it. 10. She misses her long black hair, so she may feel sad or upset about that. 11. The school has the rule because teachers think a cool hairstyle is a waste of time and money, and it may distract students from their studies. 12. Teachers say that. 13. No, Liang's school is not the only one that has these rules; many other schools have similar rules. 14. Liang thinks that the only way students can express their individuality is through how they wear their hair. 15. No, they cannot wear whatever clothes they want. 16. They have to wear school uniforms. 17. Not all students agree with Liang. 18. Li Man disagrees. 19. Li Man is a Senior 1 student. 20. Li Man thinks that there could be minor changes to the hairstyle rules, but they should not allow dyeing or curling hair, to prevent complaints.

question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Is the premise "A little girl is in a crowd of people holding a rope attached to a sheep." true if "A little girl is taking the sheep for a walk."? pick from the following. (1). yes; (2). it is not possible to tell; (3). no;

answer:(2). it is not possible to tell; The premise "A little girl is in a crowd of people holding a rope attached to a sheep" cannot be determined to be true or false based solely on the statement "A little girl is taking a sheep for a walk." While the two scenarios are related, there is not enough information provided to establish a definitive connection between them. In the statement, "A little girl is taking the sheep for a walk," it can be inferred that the girl is indeed holding a rope or some other means to control and guide the sheep as they walk, similar to walking a dog. However, several key elements are missing to conclusively link this to the premise given: 1. Crowd of people: The statement does not mention a crowd of people, only a girl walking the sheep. They might be walking in an isolated area or a populated area, but we cannot determine that from the information provided. 2. Holding a rope: Although it's likely that the girl may be using a rope to walk the sheep, the statement does not explicitly mention it. It could be a leash, a rope, or even a harness of some sort. Although not using a rope is less common, we cannot rule out that possibility. 3. Affirmation of the premise: The statement given describes a similar scenario to the premise, but it does not directly affirm that the premise is true. For example, if the statement said, "A little girl is taking the sheep for a walk through a crowd of people holding a rope attached to the animal," we could then determine that both situations are describing the same event. Due to these discrepancies and lack of details, it is not possible to tell if the premise is true based on the statement given.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Write a question about the following article: Attempting to bounce back from the Week 2 loss to the Packers, the Bears faced the St. Louis Rams. Throughout the course of the game, the Bears defense sacked Rams quarterback Sam Bradford six times, marking the first time the Bears defense has recorded at least five sacks in back-to-back games since the team's 2001 season. The six sacks increased the Bears season sack total to 14, which led the league, and is the most they have recorded in the first three games since 1987. On the offensive side, however, Jay Cutler completed only 17 of 31 passes for 183 yards and an interception (by Cortland Finnegan; Finnegan appeared to fumble on the return, and the ball was recovered by Bears receiver Devin Hester, but the fumble was overturned), and a mere passer rating of 58.9. With running back Matt Forte out for the game, the Bears rushing attack ran for 103 yards and Michael Bush ran for a 3-yard touchdown. In the second quarter, Rams kicker Greg Zuerlein kicked a 56-yard field goal, the longest in Soldier Field history. In the fourth quarter, Bears cornerback Tim Jennings deflected a Bradford pass intended for Danny Amendola to Major Wright, who returned the interception 45 yards for a touchdown. Question about the article:

answer:How many times did the Bears defense sack the Rams quarterback, Sam Bradford, in their game after their Week 2 loss, and was it the first time the Bears defense recorded at least five sacks in back-to-back games since a specific year?

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded